Observability tools¶
Warning
This feature is experimental, and could have breaking changes or even be removed without notice. Try it out, let us know what you think, but don’t rely on it just yet!
Motivation¶
Understanding what your code is doing - for example, why your test failed - is often
a frustrating exercise in adding some more instrumentation or logging (or print()
calls)
and running it again. The idea of observability
is to let you answer questions you didn’t think of in advance. In slogan form,
Debugging should be a data analysis problem.
By default, Hypothesis only reports the minimal failing example… but sometimes you might want to know something about all the examples. Printing them to the terminal with verbose output might be nice, but isn’t always enough. This feature gives you an analysis-ready dataframe with useful columns and one row per test case, with columns from arguments to code coverage to pass/fail status.
This is deliberately a much lighter-weight and task-specific system than e.g. OpenTelemetry. It’s also less detailed than time-travel debuggers such as rr or pytrace, because there’s no good way to compare multiple traces from these tools and their Python support is relatively immature.
Configuration¶
If you set the HYPOTHESIS_EXPERIMENTAL_OBSERVABILITY
environment variable,
Hypothesis will log various observations to jsonlines files in the
.hypothesis/observed/
directory. You can load and explore these with e.g.
pd.read_json(".hypothesis/observed/*_testcases.jsonl", lines=True)
,
or by using the sqlite-utils and datasette libraries:
sqlite-utils insert testcases.db testcases .hypothesis/observed/*_testcases.jsonl --nl --flatten
datasette serve testcases.db
If you are experiencing a significant slow-down, you can try setting
HYPOTHESIS_EXPERIMENTAL_OBSERVABILITY_NOCOVER
instead; this will disable coverage information
collection. This should not be necessary on Python 3.12 or later.
Collecting more information¶
If you want to record more information about your test cases than the arguments and
outcome - for example, was x
a binary tree? what was the difference between the
expected and the actual value? how many queries did it take to find a solution? -
Hypothesis makes this easy.
event()
accepts a string label, and optionally a string or int or
float observation associated with it. All events are collected and summarized in
Test statistics, as well as included on a per-test-case basis in our observations.
target()
is a special case of numeric-valued events: as well as
recording them in observations, Hypothesis will try to maximize the targeted value.
Knowing that, you can use this to guide the search for failing inputs.
Data Format¶
We dump observations in json lines format, with each line
describing either a test case or an information message. The tables below are derived
from this machine-readable JSON schema
, to
provide both readable and verifiable specifications.
Note that we use json.dumps()
and can therefore emit non-standard JSON
which includes infinities and NaN. This is valid in JSON5,
and supported by some JSON parsers
including Gson in Java, JSON.parse()
in Ruby, and of course in Python.
Test case¶
Describes the inputs to and result of running some test function on a particular input. The test might have passed, failed, or been abandoned part way through (e.g. because we failed a |
||||
properties |
||||
|
A tag which labels this observation as data about a specific test case. |
|||
const |
test_case |
|||
|
Whether the test passed, failed, or was aborted before completion (e.g. due to use of |
|||
enum |
passed, failed, gave_up |
|||
|
If non-empty, the reason for which the test failed or was abandoned. For Hypothesis, this is usually the exception type and location. |
|||
type |
string |
|||
|
The string representation of the input. |
|||
type |
string |
|||
|
A structured json-encoded representation of the input. Hypothesis provides a dictionary of argument names to json-ified values, including interactive draws from the |
|||
type |
object |
|||
|
How the input was generated, if known. In Hypothesis this might be an explicit example, generated during a particular phase with some backend, or by replaying the minimal failing example. |
|||
type |
string / null |
|||
|
Runtime observations which might help explain what this test case did. Hypothesis includes target() scores, tags from event(), and so on. |
|||
type |
object |
|||
|
Mapping of filename to list of covered line numbers, if coverage information is available, or None if not. Hypothesis deliberately omits stdlib and site-packages code. |
|||
type |
object / null |
|||
additionalProperties |
type |
array |
||
items |
type |
integer |
||
minimum |
1 |
|||
uniqueItems |
True |
|||
|
The time in seconds taken by non-overlapping parts of this test case. Hypothesis reports execute:test, and generate:{argname} for each argument. |
|||
type |
object |
|||
additionalProperties |
type |
number |
||
minimum |
0 |
|||
|
Arbitrary metadata which might be of interest, but does not semantically fit in ‘features’. For example, Hypothesis includes the traceback for failing tests here. |
|||
type |
object |
|||
|
The name or representation of the test function we’re running. |
|||
type |
string |
|||
|
unix timestamp at which we started running this test function, so that later analysis can group test cases by run. |
|||
type |
number |
Information message¶
Info, alert, and error messages correspond to a group of test cases or the overall run, and are intended for humans rather than machine analysis. |
||
properties |
||
|
A tag which labels this observation as general information to show the user. Hypothesis uses info messages to report statistics; alert or error messages can be provided by plugins. |
|
enum |
info, alert, error |
|
|
The title of this message |
|
type |
string |
|
|
The body of the message. May use markdown. |
|
type |
string |
|
|
The name or representation of the test function we’re running. For Hypothesis, usually the Pytest nodeid. |
|
type |
string |
|
|
unix timestamp at which we started running this test function, so that later analysis can group test cases by run. |
|
type |
number |